Not long ago, I wrote a long survey about all the research and conclusions I had made on the subject of right and wrong.Although the articles are arranged in a neat and orderly way, the content is so much that people can’t help but be overwhelmed. For a time, I don’t know where to look. For this, I need to write my review and reflection on this project here.
The reason for this project is that I have been very interested in this topic since a long time ago, but my understanding of it is only at a very superficial level. Although I am interested in it, I have never investigated it deeply…Well, so I took the opportunity to conduct a detailed investigation on the subject of misperception.
In the whole process, I spent a lot of time just in information literacy and collecting and sorting out the messy information.Plus even collected can not use those information, I also need to build a complete system of classification to distinguish the categories of information, and then also need to cut and add information to some logical confusion text into a text semantic fluency, let a person be clear at a glance, or to some extent to understand words appropriate to add some simple examples to illustrate, or myself after reading a large number of fragments of information integrating it, to be a complete paragraphs, which also need to join my own understanding and ideas…It’s really not as simple as it looks, although I ended up running out of time to experiment – it’s not an excuse!
But it’s also a point of reflection.I could have done it all more efficiently in the process;I have plenty of free time to make good use of;Could have checked it again after it was written…But I didn’t do any of that because I was lazy and I didn’t want to do any of that, and the result was that the survey turned into something that looked like a paper but wasn’t a paper.
After finishing the investigation, I had to do two experiments in a hurry due to the lack of time. Although I thought the experiments were ok except for the lack of artistic quality, the problem was still the quantity — the number of experiments was really too small!
This is a bit like the paper, written a lot of words, but the actual practical production of things are too little, even if you have more words will not be much persuasive and impact.
And then there’s the presentation.The first time I gave the lecture, I directly used the survey written by myself as the model. However, due to the large amount of writing and scattered emphasis, I had to turn over a few words when I was giving the lecture, which made other students have a very bad experience.Because I did not make full preparations in advance, My thinking was a little confused when I was speaking, which led to uncontrollable chaos.
After my speech, the teacher also gave a feedback to my investigation: all the information found in the investigation should be quoted, otherwise others would not know which information was from the Internet and which was written by myself. In addition, some copyright problems may be caused if the situation goes on like this.This is indeed my negligence, it is not good to distinguish.
Having written so much, let me summarize here.First of all, what I need to reflect on is that I’ve spent too much time on research;Secondly, as a result, I did a small number of experiments, and I did not have much time to prepare the speech.Finally, due to my lack of copyright awareness, I did not realize the significance of the information I found when using it, which led to the phenomenon of infringement.