中文：
就在前不久，我写了一篇长长~的调查，里面介绍了我这段时间以来所有的对错视这个主题所进行的调查与得出的结论。文章虽然排列整齐很有序，但内容之多不禁让人有些目不暇接，一时间不知道看哪里，对此，我需要在这里专门来写一下我对于这个项目的回顾与反思。
这个项目的起因是因为我打从很早以前开始就一直对这个主题非常感兴趣，但我自己对它对的了解又只停留在了非常浅层次的地方，我虽然对此感兴趣却从来没有过深入调查呢……唔，所以我便借此机会，以‘错视’为主题，对此展开了详细的调查。
整个过程下来，光是信息素养、收集整理那些杂乱的信息就耗费了我非常多的时间；再加上那些信息就算收集了也不一定能为我所用，我还需要构建一个完整的分类体系来区分那些信息的类别，然后还需要对信息进行删减与添加，将一些逻辑混乱的文本改成语意通顺、让人一目了然的文字，或者给一些生涩难懂的文字适当的添加一些简单易懂的小例子来说明，又或者我自己阅读大量碎片化的信息后将其整合，写成一段完整的文字，其中还需要加入我自己对此的理解与想法……这个东西真的没有看上去的那么简单，虽然这导致我最后都没什么时间多做点试验——这真的不是借口啦！
不过这也是一个需要反思的点。在这个过程中我本可以更有效率的做完这一切；我所拥有大量的空暇时间也可以充分利用；本可以在写完后再检查一遍的……但这些我都没做，因为自己的惰性的缘故，我不想做这些麻烦事，嘛，其结果就是这篇调查变成了一篇像论文但又不是论文的东西呐。做完调查后，我因为时间不多的缘故只能匆匆忙忙的做了两个试验，虽然我觉得试验方面除了没有太强的艺术性以外都还可以，但问题还是出在数量上——试验的数量实在是太少了！
这样就有点像纸上谈兵，文字写了一大堆，但实际动手实践制作的东西太少了，就算你的文字再多也没多少说服性与冲击性。
接下来就是演讲方面。我第一次讲的时候是直接用自己写的调查为蓝本讲的，但由于写的东西很多，再加上重点分散，这导致我在讲的时候不得不讲一点就翻翻翻，这让其他同学的观感体验非常差；我自己也是因为没有提前做好充分的准备，在讲的时候思维有点混乱，这样下去就一发不可收拾的乱起来了。
在我演讲完后老师也针对我的调查对此提出了一个反馈：调查中搜索到的信息都需要引用，不然别人不知道哪些是网上的信息，哪些是本人写的，而且这样下去还有可能会引发一些版权问题。这也的确是我的疏忽，不好好的加以区分可不行。
写了那么多，这里就让我总结一下吧。首先，我需要反思的地方我在调查方面花费的时间太多了；其次，这里连带导致了我做的试验品数量少，同时也让我没有特别多的时间去准备演讲；最后，我因为缺乏版权意识，在使用那些找来的信息时并未意识到事情重大，这导致会发生侵权的现象。
English：
Not long ago, I wrote a long survey about all the research and conclusions I had made on the subject of right and wrong.Although the articles are arranged in a neat and orderly way, the content is so much that people can’t help but be overwhelmed. For a time, I don’t know where to look. For this, I need to write my review and reflection on this project here.
The reason for this project is that I have been very interested in this topic since a long time ago, but my understanding of it is only at a very superficial level. Although I am interested in it, I have never investigated it deeply…Well, so I took the opportunity to conduct a detailed investigation on the subject of misperception.
In the whole process, I spent a lot of time just in information literacy and collecting and sorting out the messy information.Plus even collected can not use those information, I also need to build a complete system of classification to distinguish the categories of information, and then also need to cut and add information to some logical confusion text into a text semantic fluency, let a person be clear at a glance, or to some extent to understand words appropriate to add some simple examples to illustrate, or myself after reading a large number of fragments of information integrating it, to be a complete paragraphs, which also need to join my own understanding and ideas…It’s really not as simple as it looks, although I ended up running out of time to experiment – it’s not an excuse!
But it’s also a point of reflection.I could have done it all more efficiently in the process;I have plenty of free time to make good use of;Could have checked it again after it was written…But I didn’t do any of that because I was lazy and I didn’t want to do any of that, and the result was that the survey turned into something that looked like a paper but wasn’t a paper.
After finishing the investigation, I had to do two experiments in a hurry due to the lack of time. Although I thought the experiments were ok except for the lack of artistic quality, the problem was still the quantity — the number of experiments was really too small!
This is a bit like the paper, written a lot of words, but the actual practical production of things are too little, even if you have more words will not be much persuasive and impact.
And then there’s the presentation.The first time I gave the lecture, I directly used the survey written by myself as the model. However, due to the large amount of writing and scattered emphasis, I had to turn over a few words when I was giving the lecture, which made other students have a very bad experience.Because I did not make full preparations in advance, My thinking was a little confused when I was speaking, which led to uncontrollable chaos.
After my speech, the teacher also gave a feedback to my investigation: all the information found in the investigation should be quoted, otherwise others would not know which information was from the Internet and which was written by myself. In addition, some copyright problems may be caused if the situation goes on like this.This is indeed my negligence, it is not good to distinguish.
Having written so much, let me summarize here.First of all, what I need to reflect on is that I’ve spent too much time on research;Secondly, as a result, I did a small number of experiments, and I did not have much time to prepare the speech.Finally, due to my lack of copyright awareness, I did not realize the significance of the information I found when using it, which led to the phenomenon of infringement.